Section III. Alignments
29) Align jack to knuckle core
In order for the power to be transmitted from the
whippen to the hammershank efficiently, the jack must be properly aligned under
the knuckle.
Looking at the action sideways, the rear of the jack
(the surface towards the hammer) should line up perfectly with the rear of the knuckle
core. Normally, this alignment is easy to see. The knuckle should be glued on
perpendicular to the shank, and if the hammer is new and was bored correctly,
the shank should be perpendicular to the jack. Sighting along the rear of the
jack, it should be easy to tell when the jack is in line with the knuckle core.
However, if the shank is not perpendicular to the jack
this alignment is hard to see. Two things can cause this:
A. The
hammer has worn resulting in the capstan being turned up to keep the blow
distance close enough. The shank then becomes more than 90 degrees from the rear
of the jack. In such cases, imagine a line drawn from the rear of the knuckle
core down to the point on the knuckle leather where the jack would touch it.
Then line up the rear of the jack to this point.
B. The other reason, which is fairly common, is that
the hammer hole was not placed correctly in the molding. This results in the top
of the hammer, either, being too high, or too low in relation to a line drawn
down the middle of the hammershank.
Boring
the hammer wrong of course results in the shank not being perpendicular to the
jack as in cause A. If this angle of the shank to the jack becomes too great,
then either the hammer has worn excessively so that it should be replaced, or
if the hammers are new, then the hole in the molding should be plugged and
rebored.
Why
was the hammer bored incorrectly? Have you ever noticed when regulating the
hammer-blow distance, that when the tops of the hammers are adjusted so they all
are, say, 1 3/4” from the strings at rest, that the hammers in each section
vary as to their heights measured from the keybed to the top of the hammers?
We should
expect the bass hammers to be higher since the bass strings are higher so they
can cross over the tenor strings. But notice that if the agraffes are not the
same height as the capo d’astro, the hammers will also vary in their heights
between these sections.
If
the original or duplicate hammers were not bored taking into account these
different string heights, then the hammershanks will not be perpendicular to
the jacks with the hammers at rest.
We
will discuss this problem further in a later post on hammers, but let me add
here that some pianos have a different string height for each section!
An
easy way to align all of the jacks is to align the end hammers in each section,
and then by using a straightedge or a thread, align the jacks in the respective
sections to the end samples.
Note
that some manufacturers mark a line on top of the balanciers. This line serves
as a guide only when the action parts are being assembled in the factory. If it
is necessary to deviate from this line, don’t hesitate.
To
test the jack alignment, hold the hammer with one hand to keep it from coming
up, and with the other hand, give the key a strong blow. If the jack is too far
in or out in relation to the knuckle core, the jack will slip out from the force
of the blow given to the key. This test should be given to all 88 keys.
When
the knuckles are all in a straight line, and if all of the jack tops are also
in a straight line, this test should prove out on every key.
But
many pianos made today do not have all of the knuckles lined up perfectly, some
being out of line by an 1/8“! For these pianos, the jacks must be individually aligned
to their respective knuckle cores.
Remember
in replacing a whole set of shanks and flanges, the knuckles must be the same
size as the original, and the distance from the centre pin to the centre of the
knuckle core must be identical.
30)
Align and square backchecks to hammer tails.
To
facilitate this regulation, turn the action around so the backchecks are facing
you. Individually lift the end of the key and wait for the hammer to come into
check. Don’t lift the key so forcibly that the hammershank is marred by hitting
against the drop screw, or actually broken off from the impact! Look to see if
the hammer tail is caught in the middle of the backcheck and that the backcheck
is square and aligned to the hammer molding.
To
correct the side-to-side alignment, first bend the backcheck wire at the bottom
to the right or to the left as needed, then bend it at the top to square the
backcheck with the tail. This procedure is the same as when bending damper wires.
Check
to see if the backcheek is turned or if the hammer tail was not filed properly
on angled hammers. The two should be adjusted or filed so the stress on the key
when the hammer goes into check is in line with the key itself.
Some
imported pianos from Asia were made with the backchecks turned to meet the
angle of the tails in the bass and tenor sections. This stressed not only the
key bushings but also the hammer centre.
File
these tails square to the ends of the keys as they should be, and turn the
backchecks so they are square to the tails. If the tails are not filed
properly, the protruding corner of the tail will cut into the backcheck leather
in no time.
While
aligning, make certain that the tails are roughed up enough to keep the hammer
securely caught by the backcheck. I use 60-grit, open-coat sandpaper glued on to
a hand file for roughing up old hammers. New hammers I rough up before they are
glued onto the shanks. I would caution use of coarse files or moto-tool saw
blades to roughen up tails, as these make the tails so rough they wear the
leather out prematurely.
This
ends the third section of our 50-point procedure. At the beginningof this
series of posts about grand regulation, I mentioned that section IV, The Touch,
was the most variable part of the regulation, and that depending upon the needs
of the action, the sequence may be changed.
In
the first post on grand regulation, I included a chart which shows how the different
regulations of The Touch affect or are affected by the others. A quick glance at
this chart reveals that three steps: A. the key height, B. the key dip, and C.
the blow distance affect or are affected by the others the most.
Before
we begin talking about all the steps in section IV, let us discuss how to get
the correct relationship of these three steps. Without doing this first, the
regulator can waste many hours on section IV trying to figure out why the action
does not play at its peak performance.
Way
back in step 12 in section I, we adjusted the keyheight. All that remains here
is to adjust the blow and the dip. l will explain two methods to regulate a
grand piano. One is the blow-priority method; the other is the dip-priority.
I
contend that once the keyheight is set, one only needs to set the dip or the
blow, and the remainder of the action can be regulated to peak performance, straight
through, with little or no doubling back to alter previously set measurements.
In the next post, we will continue with a discussion of these two methods.
No comments:
Post a Comment