Grand Regulation In Detail – The Let-off continued - part 14

33) Let-off (continued)

Previously discussed were the regulation steps that affect the point of let-off, namely the jack alignment to the knuckle and the raising or lowering of the whippen either through altering the key height or by turning the capstan. The amount that these changes would affect the point of let-off is marginal. It is far more important to realize that regulating the let-off affects other steps more than the other steps affect it.

The two steps which are affected by regulating the let-off are dip and drop. Remember that in this discussion dip includes aftertouch. Looking first at how let-off affects drop, let us define drop as the amount of downward movement that the hammer has after the point of let-off. Keep in mind that the regulator has to move the key downward very slowly in order to see this drop of the hammer. During normal playing, this drop as such would not be visible, as the hammer would just rebound from the string into check.

 

If a graph were drawn to show the movements of the hammer versus the slow, downward movement of the key by the technician, the amount of drop and how it is affected by the let-off becomes clear. In all of the graphs shown, the key dip is set to a specific measurement which will not be changed. In figure 1 the hammer travels upwards from the point of rest and lets-off (marked “A”) at 1/8” from the string. The hammer then drops away from the string let’s say another 1/8” (marked “B”), and then rises back up yet another 1/8” (marked “C”). This last upward movement of the hammer coincides with a small downward movement of the key which we will define as aftertouch.

Figure 2 illustrates what happens when the hammer lets-off closer to the string, all of the other regulation steps staying unaltered. The point of let-off has changed to 1/16” from the string, the drop increases to about 3/16”, and the aftertouch decreases to about 1/2” of what it was in figure 1. The aftertouch decreases because it took more key dip to raise the hammer to a higher point of let-off, and it took a fraction more dip for the hammer to drop the farther distance compared to figure 1. The pianist will complain that the piano now “plays hard” since there is insufficient aftertouch. The action also feels a bit sloppy because of the excessive drop. He might even notice that when playing very lightly the hammers have a tendency to “bubble”.

Figure 3 tells what changes happen when the let-off is too far from the string. Here the point of let-off is 3/16” from the string. The drop now decreases to about 1/16” and the aftertouch increases to about 1-1/2 times as much as in Figure 1. The aftertouch increases here for the same reasons why it decreased in Figure 2. It took less dip to raise the hammer to the point of let-off, and less dip for the hammer to drop the smaller distance. In this case the pianist will complain that the keys feel spongy, as there is too much aftertouch. I doubt that he would complain of too little drop, as he would not normally be able to feel it. The complaint may be heard of slower repetition.

As can be seen from these graphs, a change in the point of let-off can really affect another regulation step. I will explain now why it is important to know that ... 

Read more:

https://www.professionalpianotunerlondon.co.uk/post/grand-regulation-in-detail-the-let-off-continued-part-14